
Sunday, May 25, 2008
Wednesday, May 14, 2008
NEBRASKANS BEWARE

This story is picking up more and more traction as a fair number of no doubt latte-sipping flip-flopping Nebraska LIB-rawls question why the level-headed six shooters at Game & Parks couldn't have relocated the bear (see recent stories in Omaha World-Herald and Lincoln Journal Star here, here and here).
A quick review of these articles will reveal that Game & Parks is doing a fair amount of after-the-fact rationalizing. Unfortunately the reality of the situation is far different. Here are excerpts from a friend of mine who lives in Harrison about the whole incident:
“The small brown bear apparently drifted down from the ridge and came through the tree-belt just north of town about 4:30-5:00 p.m. (A yearling male, somebody thought.) He crossed the football field, and then headed southeast across yards and alleys...”
Well done Game & Parks. I for one as mad as hell and this is the last straw. Game & Parks has a clear track record of “kill first, BS later.” They never come across an animal that isn’t “menacing” or “potentially dangerous” (what one earth isn’t “potentially” dangerous???), and despite the fact that these folks are supposedly experts at wildlife management, they never seem to have any equipment, knowledge or inclination to use anything but a shotgun.
UPDATE 5/23/08
Here's the NE Game & Parks "official response" to this incident on their website. They state in relevant part:
When large predators come in contact with humans in towns or around other places where people live, the result is often not positive for that particular individual, in Nebraska or anywhere else. Western states with resident bear populations annually have to kill dozens of bears which have had multiple human encounters. Colorado Division of Wildlife put down sixty- three such bears last year.To review that day’s events, Game and Parks biologists and conservation officers were called to a ranch where the bear was contained in a barn and were expected to resolve the situation. The bear was sighted within the town of Harrison earlier in the day, and had subsequently appeared at the ranch north of town. The chances of this happening at random were miniscule; the bear was obviously attracted to human habitations, either through sight or smell, as potential food sources. There was no reason to believe this pattern of behavior would suddenly change, so relocating the bear anywhere near other habitations would very likely have resulted in more interactions with people. Although uncommon, black bears have attacked humans, so the concern for public safety could not be dismissed. Given the extensive movements of this bear and the density of human habitations even in sparsely populated western Nebraska, relocating the bear within the state was not a realistic option.
'Nice story, but not exactly squaring with the facts of Harrison residents. First, G&P was not expected the "resolve the situation." Harrison residents were quite capable of doing that on their own. They were assured that the G&P wildlife "professionals" would relocate the bear; if the "resolution" was killing, Harrison residents are certainly capable of doing that on their own.
Second, G&P appears to place great emphasis on the fact that the bear was sighted near human habitation twice, as if this were conclusive evidence of a "problem bear" that would continue to do so. In fact, Harrison residents confirm that the bear was acting as if it was quite scared and wanted nothing to do with humans. It ended up at the ranch after being "escorted" by Harrison residents themselves...it did not show up there a second time independently.
"Pattern of behavior..." What "pattern"??? A bear showed up ONCE to a small town, ran away at top speed from all humans, and was forcibly "corralled" into a barn. How on earth is that a "pattern" of anything?
"Black bears attacking humans..." Yes I'm sure it does happen. G&P please "put up or shut up" with some facts here....put up some studies showing us how often black bear attacks occur, and compare those facts with other potential threats to human safety.
Somebody's lying...I wonder who? Who has the motive/reason to be deceptive about this incident after-the-fact? Harrison residents or G&P now that their "shoot first" and "rationale later" policy has once again been questioned.
G&P "professionals" in "wildlife management" seem to do no better than a bunch of rednecks in a pickup full of shotguns, and the latter would be much cheaper for Nebraska taxpayers.
PFPS Incidentally, I provided detailed contact info for several Harrison residents substantiating the above account to both the Omaha World-Herald (Paul Hammel) and Lincoln Journal-Star. Neither has, to my knowledge, chosen to actually practice a little investigative journalism and actually question the "official" Game & Parks account. 'Nice work local McMedia...